20
An epic Classic Traveller campaign of 17 players all at once? (And easier to run than a table of 4)
(mythicmountainsrpg.substack.com)
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
20 points (95.5% liked)
rpg
4337 readers
30 users here now
This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs
Rules (wip):
- Do not distribute pirate content
- Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
- Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
- Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
- Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
- Do not advertise for livestreams
- Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
- Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
- No Zak S content.
- Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
- No AI-generated content. Discussion of AI generation pertaining to RPGs is explicitly allowed.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Good read, it's interesting how this differs from DND. Crazy cool how they are juggling 17 people, and DND falls apart with ~5.
I have read stories that D&D in the 70s it was normal to have groups of 10-20 people. There were player roles like "mappers" for drawing the map. There was a "caller" who summarized the player moves for the GM.
D&D in the '70s was more like a strategy wargame than a TTRPG as we know them now.
I don't get these low numbers. pathfinder's default assumes four but back in the day 6 was kinda the ideal party. If we did not have enough players sometimes someone would control two characters.
Have to agree about six. The classic D&D videogames didn't choose a party size of 6 by accident in their designs.
That being said, the push towards four instead definitely started in 3.0's playtesting, on the assumption that parties would have one of each basic archetype (warrior, rogue, arcane caster, divine caster) for some reason. It probably also had a lot to do with how scheduling a dedicated table becomes exponentially more difficult with each added player.
we often did not have six but it was not uncommon to have 3 players playing two characters and a gamemaster.