charonn0

I don't think that works. You'd still have a situation where the plaintiffs are asking the court to decide US foreign and defense policy.

Which US laws are you talking about?

I'm referring to the lawsuit itself. It may be "very real", but it's also complete nonsense.

US courts don't rule on political questions, nor do they decide US foreign policy, nor do they provide advisory opinions. This lawsuit fails to state a cognizable claim and seeks relief that is beyond the power of the judiciary to grant.

Well, let's see, the lawsuit was filed in the United States, in a US court, and under US laws.

So, obviously, I'm talking about Outer Mongolia.

That's not how the courts work here.

Training in a job related field is actually related to job performance.

But it's not really about the bonus. It's about the boundaries. I see no problem with setting hard boundaries between personal life and work life.

Oh, grow up.

I assumed you were addressing me and my point since you posted your comment as a direct response to me and my comment. That is usually how internet comments work.

Thank you for clarifying.

Yet, the SJWs of America come out of the wood work to berate an idea of trying to move a little bit more and use “disabilities” as a shield to trying to do something that is healthy for

I haven't said anything about disabilities.

Just because it's good for the company does not mean it's not overstepping boundaries.

I'm sure there are lots of ways bosses might want their employees to change in their personal lives because it might benefit the company. But that's the part that's overstepping.