this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
71 points (98.6% liked)

LGBTQ+

4245 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh really? Every way? What about boardroom bigotry, huh? Bet their prejudice KPIs took a hit this quarter. I'll wager their were fewer executive sexual harassment accusations, too.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

[Sarcasm] You mean DEI makes things less prejudice and work better? We are shocked!

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

Me: shocked

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

I think it’s more a correlation than a causation. It is not that LGBTQ are better at running companies, but that a company that never promotes or advances them is almost certainly not promoting based on capability and appropriateness for a position.

More likely it’s promoting based on personal relationships and connections, an old boys network. Which leads to people who are less qualified, but better connected, ending up up running things.

Counter to what the anti-DEI people will claim, diversity in a company is the result of hiring the best qualified people, a company that lacks diversity is a sign of poor hiring practices.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 6 months ago

Rome did too (mostly)