this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
224 points (88.1% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

That sure will encourage work on environmental issues. /s

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Name a better form of protest to get the people's attention.
Spoiler: They've tried that before.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The world is making progress in climate change. This isn't going to make it go faster.

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The world is making progress in climate change.

It better hurry the fuck up.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Throwing soup on paintings discredits environmentalism to a lot of people. But what they should really be upset about is misleading graphs cherry-picked to look as alarming as possible.

Sea ice is a concerning indicator, sure, but if you look at other news and other graphs about it you'll not find anything like this gigantic drop. In particular in the section of that page about Antarctic ice:

At the beginning of December, ice extents were at record low levels. However, the seasonal decline in Antarctic ice extent subsequently slowed. As a result, by the beginning of the new year, extent was only sixth lowest.

It also notes that Arctic sea ice extents were typical during 2023, so whatever was happening to Antarctic ice wasn't necessarily an indication of global trends.

I am an environmentalist, I want to see continued effort being made on switching to renewable resources and ameliorating the effects of climate change. But I worry that a lot of environmentalists are crying wolf very loudly and it's going to harm the movement in the long run when people realize how overblown some of these arguments are.

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No one cares what people think about the movement in the long run.
Having a long run is the goal.

Personally, I think we have 20 years left in which we can pretend to do something against climate change (because nothing has actually been achieved, CO2-output keeps climbing, completely unaffected by this whole debate).
By 2045, conditions around the equator will trigger a global migration north, then we'll go back to bombing each other at large scale and all mitigation efforts are over.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They didn't throw soup on a painting. They threw soup on glass that was in front of a painting. No paintings were harmed in this protest.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Okay, amend my comment to read "throwing soup at paintings." Any other changes needed?

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

While continuing to tap new oil fields and failing to make sufficient progress. Also, this one isn't about climate, but healthy and sustainable food. Connected issues, but still.

All that aside, to come back to the somewhat dodged question, what would make things go faster?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's the good question. I'm not sure there is one. We ( the world) were slow off the ball on climate change and its not like we move like a power boat, more like a barge.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Well voting for one. Have people tried that?

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 years ago
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Your reading comprehension is poor. This isnt about climate change. This is about food security.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

.... So they threw away food to make a statement?

This is like protesting pollution by purposely throwing oil into the ocean. Generally speaking the act of protest should not directly intensify the problem.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A can of soup dude. The trashcans at the Louvre have far more food waste than a can of soup. What larger good can be done with a single can of soup?

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Feeding a person.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Random insult back atcha

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

If you aren’t aware of climate change by now then you’re an absolute moron. I don’t see how soup is going to change anything

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Funnily enough this has been the most successful form of environmental activism to this day

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Successful in pissing off the general public and causing them to ignore anything of substance that you have to say, sure. Pushing people away from your cause is not a good strategy if you want to effect change.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey guys science says our plant is heating up due to carbon emissions we are creating by burning fossil fuels. Can we tone it down a bit?

No

Hey guys going to chain myself outside, because this is super important

Don't care

Hey guys, going to burn myself alive to protest climate change

Meh

Soups and super glue on art!

Oh the humanity! Why would you not engage with us in simple conversation before chucking a cream of tomato onto bulletproof glass!?

Wait..... THAT'S WHAT GOT YOUR ATTENTION?!

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

People were talking about climate change though. Movements like FFF (until Covid took the wind right out of their sails) had quite a bit of momentum, and actually were making it a mainstream topic.

Protests like this are getting people to talk about what you did, not about why you did it.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Literally killing yourself to protest climate change has barely made the news so yea, for some reason people only talk about it if you throw soup at glass in front of art for some reason.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Killing yourself to protest climate change isn't a climate issue, it's a mental health issue.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

You sound like you live in a bubble.

Hop off lemmy bro. It’s rotting out your brain.

[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

dont put /s, it ruins the joke

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

My own personal style of humor is to say absurd things with a straight face, and unfortunately I have found that on the Internet there is always going to be someone who believes me without question no matter how absurd a statement I make. Because unfortunately there's always someone on the Internet who actually believes something that absurd.