this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
197 points (99.0% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The targeting of another U.S.-owned commercial ship Wednesday shows the militant group remains intent on continuing its attacks in the face of multiple rounds of U.S. military airstrikes.

The Houthis launched anti-ship ballistic missiles at the U.S.-owned, flagged and operated commercial ship Maersk Detroit as it was transiting the Gulf of Aden, according to a statement from the U.S. Central Command. The U.S. Navy destroyer USS Gravely shot down two missiles and a third fell into the water. There were no indications of damage or injuries in the attack.

The U.S. military has been conducting airstrikes against the Houthis to degrade their capabilities since Jan.11, after several weeks of attacks on commercial ships by the militant group.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

And even if you're a ghoul and think that complying with that very reasonable demand wouldn't stop the Houthis, why not call their bluff? It costs us nothing to simply stop allowing the genocide to happen, and if the Houthis continue attacking ships, then you have a much more legitimate reason to go after them.

Or are the people that are in favor of bombing Yemen just really eager to bomb?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The Saudis have been bombing it for Allah knows how long, so it's business as usual for everyone involved.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's neither here, nor there. The answer isn't to make the bombing in Yemen worse.

If the only demand is to stop genociding Palestinians, then the US government should simply stop supporting Israel in their genocide.

If the Houthis continue attacking ships after that, then by all means, do what you need to do to handle the Houthis. But the US government can't even be bothered to call for a ceasefire, so they leave it up to militant groups to act.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They are actually in the process of calling for a ceasefire. Biden pissed off Netanyahu as well. There's diplomacy in the background to get a ceasefire and more hostages freed.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Violence is being done to this group at such an alarming rate that it's being treated as normal. So violence is fine, they're used to it"

That's what that sounded like to me.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was being facetious, but yes that's what I was saying.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Oh good! That makes more sense

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, that was already pointed out.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I was asking because I couldn’t tell if your comment was sarcastic or not.

I was trying to figure out if I was getting whooshed. lol

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And were doing it with bombs sold to them by the US and UK.

I wouldn't be surprised if the serial numbers on some of the stuff the US and UK is now dropping directly on the Houtis shows them to be from the same batches as some of the stuff that was dropped on them via the Saudis.

The idea that the US and UK cutting off the middleman to keep on doing to the Houtis what has been done to them for a decade, is going to make the Houtis change their minds, is hilarious.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It CoStS us nOtHiNg

You really don’t know what you’re talking about when it comes to policy. It’s not just a simple “okay let’s cut ties with Israel”.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Calling for a cease fire isn't "cutting ties with Israel", and if you think that funding a genocidal ethnostate is a necessary part of foreign policy, your foreign policy would have been very helpful for the Axis Powers, you absolute monster.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They actually might throw a hissy fit if we withhold aid and expel US diplomats or something. We'd lose a major base in the middle east, but (if you'll allow for a little American exceptionalism) they don't call the fucking shots here.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

I'll allow for what you're referring to as American exceptionalism if it's reflective of reality. And, in the case of the US being a world superpower, and Israel's top (external) source of military funding, that is the reality.

So, yes. The far-right Israeli government might throw a hissy fit over the US government adopting a "genocide is a non-starter" policy for supporting them, but the US calls the shots. If Israel doesn't like it, too fucking bad.