smiletolerantly

joined 2 years ago
[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 50 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yep.

Those older movies are beautiful achievements for sure. But it's disingenuous to say that there isn't a plethora of movies and shows today that rival and surpass those older examples visually. Not to speak of just how much more fluent animation has become.

Many of the people who worked on those older masterpieces are still in animation today, and have only become better at their art.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 129 points 3 months ago (8 children)

They are still being being painted by hand. On a graphics tablet, for example.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 10 points 5 months ago

Those are excellent names

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not that I know of! Anyways, for no self-motivated reasons whatsoever, I think your cats have cool names :P

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I am named exactly like both of your cats, wtf 😄

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 12 points 8 months ago

E L E C T R O S T A B B I N G

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

OK im starting to have doubts that this is legit. Looks like OP (or OOP, idk) just found a classifier which misclassified that image. Nothing I'm seeing indicates that it's the classifier used for her stupid app.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 140 points 2 years ago (9 children)

This is hilarious, but also: how could anyone develop such a tool and not at least test it out on their own images? Someone with a public persona no less! Boggles my mind.