Ziglin

It hasn't taken down Lemmy yet so I think the quantity is fine.

I'd agree but not having to deal with theoretically gender neutral terms is a bit annoying. In German it is especially annoying because of the frequent use of generic masculine which is annoyingly common outside queer and feminist spaces.

They did mention that they were the lacking the vocab for girls specifically. I don't think this was meant to be a general suggestion.

Lick the cat then?

Tribbles!

I don't think there are that many poisonous flowers. My cat eats plenty but still manages to completely avoid the single one I know is poisonous.

Eh. Depends on the setting. They are usually shapechangers anyways which makes most labels iffy anyways.

According to the forgotten realms wiki:

In fact, with their shapechanging powers, incubi and succubi could both change their sex with ease, though most had a preference for one or the other.

I would therefore say that (at least in the forgotten realms) if this instance of fiend prefers he/him pronouns but is presenting femme or they consider themself a succubus and prefer being feminine but are currently presenting masculine the combination of pronouns he/him and label succubus seem perfectly normal.

Shhh don't tell them! We'll have to start sleeping in fireproof canisters now.

That indeed would make it significantly less useful.

Well that's what you have a coin purse or primary bag of holding for. Assuming the hand retrieving items is not folded (which I would assume is safe to assume based on how bags of holding generally work), it could be used for forging, folding washing, making something really long by reinserting it repeatedly, or sabotaging by folding things that should not be foldable.

I thought the special thing was the extra attack mentioned in the dagger at the top of the comment thread. That would seem very powerful. Your reasoning is sound for the 1d6 dagger though.

With the cheating stipulation I'd personally let greater restoration work too.