When you upload on imgur, click the ... then get share links, and then use the URL from the BBCodes part. This will link directly to the image itself, rather than the link you used which goes to the imgur website and pulls people out of lemmy or their apps.
The direct link for this post is https://i.imgur.com/PfEnQ0D.mp4. If you edit your post and use this link it will fix it.
Toll roads are for profit. Roads shouldn't be for profit.
The archive link was to archive.today, though, which while they're generally better than archive.org at circumventing paywalls they're quite dodgy and poison DNS from Cloudfire and Quad9.
Inb4 Tucker Carlson dies in the next few weeks, and everyone in close contact with him suffers serious illness, all in an attempt to get at Zelenski.
Check your underwear, Carlson, that's more of a risk to you than any window.
Where's the proof though? It's easy to say you've deleted data.
What's more, 3rd parties could have had access to the data, even if only to provide the service, and that's just another party you're blindly trusting.
The cat is long since out the bag. The sooner we make raw data freely available to everyone the better - that's certainly a more realistic hope than controlling data access or even getting businesses to pay people for the data they steal from them.
In Counter-Strike, you can still win the match even if you kill all the hostages.
They're right wing, but the factual score is Mixed, not Low. The rule states:
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Thus this post is absolutely within the rules.
If you want to challenge the post, you should do so on specific merits, not by trying to bend the rules to suit your narrative.
And what about people waving a white flag all by themselves?
What about Israeli hostages topless waving a white flag, only to be shot indiscriminately by IDF?
It wasn't labelled as "revenge for funding the UNRWA", what was stated was:
The Israeli assault has taken place after the Belgian Government announced not to suspend funding for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) on Wednesday.
It's merely an order of events, you're the one labelling it "revenge".
Furthermore, this order of events lines up with the Reuters artcile, which says:
It was not clear when the building was bombed. The spokesperson said Belgium had found out about it on Thursday evening and suspected it had happened on Wednesday.
So it would be right to point out that the Turkish source paints the timeline as a certainty when it is not certain, but if anything the Reuters article is perhaps a little too cautious in not pointing out the possibility that it was done shortly after the Belgian announcement regarding UNRWA, or even mentioning that announcement at all.
Direct link so you don't have to go to imgur: https://i.imgur.com/eacJmNr.mp4