The Venn diagram of the kink and queer communities is far from a circle. I'm not sure why kink is even part of this story. There's some overlap, sure, but it's like mapping "people whose favourite ice cream flavour is mint chocolate chip" to the queer community.
Powderhorn
cummunal
I see what you did there.
Raves -- and heavy drug use -- were my introduction to the queer community. Dancing altered around throngs of undulating bodies is inherently a charged environment.
Fucking brilliant.
The DeviantArt of 2025 is a dramatically different experience today.
What the fuck is that "today" doing there? The time element is established, and we all know it's 2025.
And you're entitled to your opinion. I don't need to present my credentials in terms of fulfilling my own sexual fantasies, nor do you need to believe that I had to create a group on FetLife so that the porn I made with my ex actually had a home.
It's generally not a great idea to tell an editor that he needs to learn how to consult dictionaries, and I hope you don't extend such pleasantries to other members of the Beehaw community.
Context is king. We're talking about literary genres, and you want to talk sex. I fully approve! This said, get off your high horse. You knew damn well the context and decided to inject irrelevant data to ... I don't know ... "win?"
We're not here to argue. If that's your goal, Beehaw is not the correct instance for you.
I ended up in middle school with my head in the lap (get your mind out of the gutter; I was facing up) of a very butch classmate after P.E. She was clearly able to break any guy in two and was, so far as any of us knew, cishet. I've not followed her progress since the '80s, but it occurs that some women are built a bit more sturdy, and that's the real issue here.
God forbid the far right learns about Scottish chicks. Actually, they should, just so their heads can explode.
Just to be clear, you won't read things like T.H. White's The Once and Future King?
I get the hate for Rowling, and I'm old enough that I grew up on Narnia instead. I never read Rowling's books, given that I was an adult, but I lived with a woman a decade younger for a time, and she was all about Harry Potter, so I slogged through all of the movies. Great acting, good production values, but I had a hard time figuring out why to care.
Worth noting, though, is that as a kid, I had no idea when the first two books were read to me in bed that C.S. Lewis was a Christian apologist. I started reading from there. I'll frankly take someone who seems to have espoused the actual teachings of Jesus over a TERF any day.
I will say that Lewis helped get me through a rough patch via Mere Christianity as an adult suffering my first marriage falling apart ... while I remain an atheist, he made compelling arguments. Rowling really has nothing of substance to say through her works.
While I appreciate the self-reflection, fantasy literally means shit that can't possibly happen in real life. If it could, well ... it wouldn't be fantasy, now would it?
Once one veers into the realistic, it's one of a number of genres, wherein "fantasy" is not considered.
Fuck. You win the internet today. 🥇
It's important to note that there are veto-proof majorities in both houses of the Legislature, which has until 2026 to overturn the vetoes. This smells like good news, but it's all sizzle, no steak.
Bwahahaha ... the idea of Florida having infrastructure.