Lojcs

joined 2 years ago
[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Confusing ass title

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I thought it was 3 in 200? Anyways gotta make those numbers bigger 📈

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They have a life changing surgery and when they go back home everyone hates them 🥺

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally just decided to 'practice' all day everyday at school without coming out to people. Had to keep a water bottle with me all the time to keep my throat from drying out. I've found that speaking brighter sounds more feminine but takes more air, which causes dryout.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Chicken bones??

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

While I think 'low t levels' is totally bullshit, are you sure your testosterone levels aren't elevated by the type of anti androgen you're using? Even estrogen is supposed to have some t reducing effects so having a higher than average t is curious

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why does this gif have a grid of tiny x's all over it? No way that's an actual compression artifact

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

write articles about it, to make it headline news

True, the article was probably written with the intention of it blowing up and I have no idea what nyt has to do with celebrity gossip.

slander

Misinformation? Slander implies it's a bad thing to be queer

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

That doesn't make you a better fan, it makes you a gossip and not an ally

Maybe I don't know proper up to date celebrity etiquette but isn't gossiping about celebrities already a thing? Why is gossiping about sexuality any more inappropriate? Like any gossip it can be denied, but just because it suggests someone might be queer it's seen as offensive.

They are doing exactly what LGTBQ+ have fought against for decades now - people making assumptions about their own lives and sexuality

???? Equating a mere suggestion to the persecution of queer people is just plainly queerphobic.

And judging by the comments on the article and a brief search on nitter, this seems to be a typical right wing outrage at hearing anything about queer people. I don't get why queer people are jumping on to defend don't ask don't tell.

and all signs point to it not being true

Can someone please direct me to a debunking of the nyt article? I mean it, this is my first exposure to this topic and it's convincing.