This 100% fits the definition of a hate crime. Someone's appearance does not tell you anything about their genitals, which is why this bathroom nonsense could never play out in reality. Her appearance may be more "masculine," but she is female and identifies as a woman. I have a strong suspicion that the reaction of these degenerates would have been the same or worse had she used the men's restroom. They desired to hurt lgbtq+ people, and no bathroom decision would have changed their actions other than to make it worse.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They could've linked the crowdfund campaign to cover her medical costs, although looks like it has been covered and then some.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

the crowdfund campaign to cover her medical costs

Has to be one of the most depressingly dystopic (true) sentences I've read.

Like yeah, it's called "taxes"

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 5 points 10 months ago

I know, it always depresses me when I see that. Even though my country could be better on a lot of things, at least I don't have to worry about medical debt.