this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

RPGMemes

15742 readers
708 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So I don't really know much about DnD and was wondering what exactly would be happening moving forward here? Does the Paladin receive some sort of debuff and then has to fight the creature alone? I don't really have any ideas

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Paladin would try to convince the rest of the party NOT to go help the poor little doggo.

[–] guy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be obvious that it's not a dog though. You don't need to see the image to know it's not gonna be a dog, given the setup

[–] LennethAegis@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Part of roleplaying is not metagaming. Even if the players suspect something is wrong, you play like you don't because your character would not know that. At least I find it more fun to play that way. I'm not there to min/max my adventure.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I wouldn’t even akin meta gaming to min-maxing, I’d say its closer to cheating. Not everyone plays the same obviously, and I’m sure some are fine with it. But your character is acting on information they couldn’t possibly know.

I get that it’s not technically cheating at a lot of tables, which is why we call it meta gaming instead, but still… it’s kinda BS.

[–] LennethAegis@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

It's only cheating if you know for sure what the DM is going to do and they are not just messing with you. This situation could totally just be an actual dog that only the Paladin thinks is a monster due to DM nonsense.