this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
72 points (95.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

4263 readers
4 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kreskin@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No one said that.

I do think a male athlete has some horomonal, bone structure, limb length and muscle mass advantages over born-female athletes in many sports, and that while time and horomone therapy do decrease that advantage for a trans female, its still there to some degree afterward, which probably makes sports in the female category for trans women unequal. Athleticism means a lot to a lot of people. for some people its a deep part of their identity, just like gender is. Is that peice of these womens identity not worth cherishing? Is it something for you to dictate terms about? I dont think it is.

Its not a simple problem with any sort of simple solution. It seems that with the choices given, Either we make a new athletic category, or some group of people live with an unfairness of one sort or another. And the sooner its figured out, ,the sooner it stops being a political football. Letting it linger just serves the far right. is that what you actually want?

Why has this issue not already been sorted?

[โ€“] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 months ago

Did you glean that from data or did you just assume it must be true?