LGBTQ+

4247 readers

127 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

ada@piefed.blahaj.zone

squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone

176

Gay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judge (metro.co.uk)

submitted 1 year ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's fucking vile

However, submitting a photograph of yourself looking at gay porn is fucking hilarious

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The problem with having to prove you're gay is that most gay people don't live their lives collecting documentary evidence of their gayness. So you unless you have contact details for a whole load of same-sex partners willing to testify that you banged, you have to contrive evidence. And then the fact that the evidence looks contrived counts against you. You can't win, and the law is an ass.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago

What evidence do they even want, your sextape? Perverts

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago

Oh absolutely 100% I agree. I understand why they did it. Its just a really funny thing.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Especially if you are fleeing a homophobic regime. You've probably done everything possible to avoid leaving evidence.

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 year ago

And that still wasn't gay enough

They should have got a photo of the moment he started blasting rope to Waluigi r34, that would have cinched it