this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
121 points (99.2% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Politicians allied with the former prime minister Imran Khan’s party have defied a military-led crackdown and alleged widespread rigging to win the most seats in Pakistan’s election, but opponent Nawaz Sharif claimed victory and said he would form a coalition government.

Candidates backed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the party run by Khan who is now serving sentences of more than a decade in jail, claimed a stunning victory after Thursday’s polls, defying all expectations that Sharif, a three-time former prime minister, and his Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) would win an easy majority.

Sharif was seen to have the backing of Pakistan’s military, which has long been the country’s political power broker and has a history of meddling in its elections.

Voters across the country, however, appear to have come out in unprecedented numbers to support PTI and Khan. Given the scale of the votes for PTI-backed candidates, according to sources the military was unable to “manage” the results for Sharif as planned.

Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Seems strange rooting for the anti-American candidate. Also: Former populist non-politician leader that was charged with corrupt bushiness dealings, mishandling US intelligence documents, and being 'non-religious' in his sexual affairs then kicked off the ballot? I wondering if this portends what will happen if Trump is behind bars in November...

Edit: I was talk about myself rooting for Khan, not the OP.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seems strange rooting for the anti-American candidate.

Then you didn't read my comment. I'm not for or against a given candidate; I am squarely FOR fair elections.

Also, not every commenter here is American, or even pro-American: who are you to turn every comment into a measure of how pro- or anti-American a comment is?

EVERYONE has a right to their own opinion based on their own experience and culture, including non-Americans and even non-pro-Americans, and there's not a goddamn "strange" thing about that at all.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

No, you misunderstood. I as an American feel odd rooting for the anti-american candidate.

[–] generalpotato@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He’s not “Anti-American”. He just doesn’t believe in boot-licking the US and the West. Big difference.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To the Americans - there is no difference.

[–] generalpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What? Sure there is. Obfuscation of facts is what leads to a shit media landscape.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ah, got it. Thanks for the clarification.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Given the edit, this is a super misleading comment.