this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The guy might be a nutjob but I don't think he's talking about getting them back through war, Argentina has next to no military.

Having colonies in the year 2023 is ridiculous though, I don't know why so many comments act like Britain is in the right here in any way whatsoever.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Since when were the Falklands an example of colonialism? Nobody lived there until the Europeans showed up.

[–] PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because the population of the Falklands (that we installed there) want to remain part of Britain for whatever stupid reason.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one else was there. Why would they want to be part of anything else?

[–] BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you think the Falklands should be part of Argentina, logically Hawaii should be part of Kiribati. Alaska should be Russian/Canadian, etc etc. If you think about it for more than a minute it becomes clear that geographical location is not the only factor or even the most important one.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

geographical location is not the only factor or even the most important one

I'm pretty sure that if another country took over Hawaii, or the Catalina Islands off the coast of California, especially just for being able to put a marker down on future oil reserves, that the US would not be ok with that claim.

Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute .

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because the people of the Falklands literally voted to stay with the UK?

[–] anonono@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

[insert obama awarding obama meme here]

I mean the UK won't return Gilbraltar to Spain who were in the EU with them they won't obviously return the falklands.

I'd like to see the UK also defending the "vote of the people" if Ireland voted to leave the UK

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

return the falklands.

To who, the French?! They're the only ones who settled there before the British (beating them by a whopping 1 year), and they left again two years after they showed up. (And I say "settled there," by the way, because if we went by who discovered it then the only people the British could return it to would be themselves.)

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

To who, the French?!

They claim ownership via Spain's ownership, when Argentina won their independence from Spain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute