this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you make it as though right to self-determination doesn’t matter

Did it for Hong Kong?

[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They do not identify as British, and Hong Kong is legally ceded back to China as part of 99 year lease deal between UK and China.

Jesus Christ, give it a rest. Of course, you conveniently ignore the practicality of even annexing the Falklands. Would you agree that Italy should retake France, Belgium, Spain, and the UK simply because Rome once occupied them? What would happen to the locals already living in the Falklands?

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

you make it as though right to self-determination doesn’t matter

Did it for Hong Kong?

They do not identify as British, and Hong Kong is legally ceded back to China as part of 99 year lease deal between UK and China.

But the residents didn't want to go to China, they wanted to exercise their "self-determination" and stay British, exactly what you've been advocating in your argument for the Falklands residents and Argentina and ownership staying with Great Britain.

Its very hypocritical to not apply the same thing to both circumstances.

[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is what I found with cursory search.

"On the day of the handover — supposedly a day of celebration and jubilation to “shaking off colonial humiliation” and “returning to the motherland” – an opinion poll found that only 35% of Hong Kong people were actually feeling happy or positive, 56% reported feeling neutral, mixed, or nothing, while 9% reported feeling down, worried, or negative. Nevertheless, the fact that only 9% were feeling negative showed that people were in general not too pessimistic. They did see themselves as Chinese (hence the mixed and complicated feelings despite the anxiety) and were willing to give China a chance, wishing for its success: 75% of people said in a poll that they remained confident about Hong Kong’s future.

https://www.briefingsforbritain.co.uk/hongkongers-and-britain-a-history-with-a-future/

Well, have you asked the local Falklanders yourselves if they want to be part of Argentina? Did you consider what they want? Would you like Argentina to return to Spain? It's easy to try to speak when it's not your own life that's at stake. But then again, Argentines have history of their own colonisation and genocide, which Charles Darwin himself noted during his visit. Keep grasping for straws.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

It would be more believable if you could recite a source that is not from a UK based organization.

From everything I've seen on TV people did not want to belong to a Communist country, and were fearful. The intellectuals were fleeing/fled the country, and the young have been protesting as China cracks down on their freedoms/rights (they had to move trools into a garrison inside of Hong Kong over the law changes/protests).

This was from watching American news, so it may have just been that slant colored the news being show, you can never tell, but the videos I saw seemed straightforward.

On a tangent, I'm going to "bow out" of further replies. I've been at this for coming up on 24 hours now, and am tired of everyone wanting their "pound of flesh", and have said pretty much everything I can say. No disrespect meant to you, just thing the conversation has reached a termination point. Take care.