this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
42 points (93.8% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
lemmyAtom@lemmy.world
42
The damning truth about the UK’s 2% inflation target: it’s completely made up | Louis-Philippe Rochon (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

But let’s focus on the choice of a 2% target. After the high inflation of the late 1970s and early 1980s, when it reached over 20% in the UK, central banks were left scrambling to find some new theoretical model to deal with rising prices. The first central bank to propose an inflation target of 2% was in New Zealand. But where did they get it from? Apparently, from thin air.

Recently, I came across this one story that suggested the choice of 2% was the result of an off the cuff remark by then New Zealand finance minister, during a TV interview, who told reporters he would be happy with an inflation between 0% and 1%. This led the governor of the central bank at the time, Don Brash, to factor in an inflation bias of roughly 1% to arrive at the magical number of 2%. Michael Reddell, a colleague of Brash’s at the time at the Reserve Bank, admitted: “It wasn’t ruthlessly scientific.” Brash himself admitted as much: “It was almost a chance remark. The figure was plucked out of the air to influence the public’s expectations.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

After the high inflation of the late 1970s and early 1980s, when it reached over 20% in the UK, central banks were left scrambling to find some new theoretical model to deal with rising prices.

Recently, I came across this one story that suggested the choice of 2% was the result of an off the cuff remark by then New Zealand finance minister, during a TV interview, who told reporters he would be happy with an inflation between 0% and 1%.

This led the governor of the central bank at the time, Don Brash, to factor in an inflation bias of roughly 1% to arrive at the magical number of 2%.

A similar version of the events was proposed, in June 2023, by the Council on Foreign Relations, which concluded that “surprisingly [a 2% target] came not from any academic study”, and that it came about “somewhat accidentally”.

In 2018, Friedman wrote, in a book honouring Vítor Constâncio, the former vice-president of the European Central Bank: “There is the arbitrariness surrounding the current 2 percent target.

We give central banks too much power over our lives and livelihoods, when fiscal policy, which concerns government spending and taxes, is where the battle should be fought.

The original article contains 871 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!