this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
124 points (95.6% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Hong Kong court has ordered one of China's biggest property developers, Evergrande Group, to liquidate after it was unable to reach a restructuring deal with creditors over hundreds of billions of dollars it owes.

Key points:

  • Evergrande has been ordered to liquidate after failing to come up with a restructuring deal with creditors over US$300 billion in debts owed
  • The liquidator will now attempt to take control of Evergrande assets outside China, but there are fears that could pave the way for other lawsuits
  • It could take years for the offshore liquidator to take control of subsidiaries across mainland China
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

China should have just ripped the bandaid off years ago.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder if ripping it off might have caused a big enough economic problem to threaten the stability of the government.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They probably weighed what would happen then vs supporting the business for a while. Problem is no one can tell the future, so they got caught.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago

It may be the best case scenario for them still. This could be their "economic soft landing".