this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
94 points (84.1% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The killing of three U.S. troops and wounding of dozens more on Sunday by Iran-backed militants is piling political pressure on President Joe Biden to deal a blow directly against Iran, a move he's been reluctant to do out of fear of igniting a broader war.

Biden's response options could range anywhere from targeting Iranian forces outside to even inside Iran, or opting for a more cautious retaliatory attack solely against the Iran-backed militants responsible, experts say.

American forces in the Middle East have been attacked more than 150 times by Iran-backed forces in Iraq, Syria, Jordan and off the coast of Yemen since the Israel-Hamas war erupted in October.

But until Sunday's attack on a remote outpost known as Tower 22 near Jordan's northeastern border with Syria, the strikes had not killed U.S. troops nor wounded so many. That allowed Biden the political space to mete out U.S. retaliation, inflicting costs on Iran-backed forces without risking a direct war with Tehran.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Talk about reductive.

The October 7 invasion of Israel by Hamas was also a result of 75 years of illegal occupation of Palestine by Israel.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

I'm sorry, I don't follow what you're trying to convey here.

That there is an even bigger picture than in my comment? Well, yes, of course. The Israel-Palestine situation is a hundred year old mess.

But how was my comment reductive as well? I didn't lay the blame squarely at the feet of any one party, which is far closer to the truth than saying "It's all Israel's fault."

And if you take contention with me being nuanced, please consider that by doing so you don't actually do any favours to the conversation and therefore a peaceful resolution that is as fair as can possibly be achieved.

So, if it helps you come back to the table, please know that I absolutely think what Israel is doing is appalling and they have an obscene power disparity over the Palestinian people and are abusing that wholesale - when they could use it to create peace.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's about as illegal as the US's occupation of America.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

By that logic, the solution to the conflict is a federation in which all citizen subjects have representative power 👹

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Legally speaking, sure, but we haven't killed natives to expand territory in a while. And they fought back when we did.

Unrelated, but my policy would be to give texas back to Mexico, the west coast to the natives, and accelerate global warming and hope Florida just sinks.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

... but we haven't killed natives to expand territory in a while.

Sure you have. When funding is kept to the lowest levels possible, and people die as a result of it, it's the same thing.

Just 'cause it takes longer than a bullet doesn't change the outcome.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social -5 points 2 years ago

What on earth are you on about? Not spending money on native Americans is not the same as annexing their lands.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When your fighters start mutilating, torturing, raping, and kidnapping civilians, It doesn't matter how righteous you think your cause is.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Indeed. Something Israelis have been doing since before 1948.