this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
131 points (96.5% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

The problem with the concept of "war crimes" is it implies honorable warfare exists.

Why don't the Russians asphyxiate people the ethical way: with white phosphorus? Are they stupid?

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago

War crimes have nothing to do with honor, and everything to do with horror. It's product of statecraft, not a code chivalry.

Also, white phosphorus is a legal illumination munition, but becomes illegal/warcrime when used as an incendiary device. It has nothing to with asphyxiation, or chemical warfare.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

White phosphorus doesn't result in asphyxiation. It does burn, which is the reason it's mostly used in flares. But, when used as an incendiary, it's quite bad.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

white phosphorus can cause asphyxiation in enclosed places like bunkers and tunnels in two different ways. By consuming all the oxygen, or by inhalation of the smoke it gives off.

The smoke given off by WF is mostly Phosphorus pentoxide. It causes severe irritation and burns to eyes and the respiratory tract.

Using WF off-label as a tear gas dates back to 1916.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Well, yes, but any fire can.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I think the idea is that countries have a better time getting their population to support a war of they have a chance of looking like the good guys. It also helps if every other country agrees to jump the guy doing the more evil shit.