this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
325 points (98.5% liked)

Trans Memes

2873 readers
250 users here now

A place to post memes relating to the transgender experience.

Rules

  1. Follow lemmy.blahaj.zone community guidelines.
  2. Posts must be trans related.
  3. No bigotry.
  4. Do not post or link to pornography.
  5. If a post is tagged with a specific gender identity, keep the conversation centered on that identity.
  6. Posts that assume the viewer’s gender and/or contain potentially triggering content must be spoilered and tagged at the beginning of the post title. Example content-warning tags that you can copy include the following:
  1. Mods can be arbitrary.

Because it apparently has to be said, this community is supportive of all forms of DIY HRT.

Recommendations

  1. Include other tags in posts for example:
  1. Include image description when possible.
  2. Link to source

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
0x2640@lemmy.blahaj.zone
325
If transphobes were fish, they'd be fished to extinction (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 5 days ago by TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don't know who the specific individuals are, however, so if anyone has some context, I'd also like to know more. But just going from context provided by OP who shared this screengrab, the photos are actually of cis men, not trans men. The post itself never actually claims otherwise, but is cleverly worded in such a way as to bait out transphobes who will emerge to voice their own bigotry without considering how incorrect it is.

TBH, the top-level comment I have trouble parsing, seems to be a general disbelief to the idea that trans men could exist. The one replying to it claims that they can "still see the female shaped heads" even though the subjects of the photos were not AFAB to begin with. Despite the assertion that they're not bigoted, they're only seeing what they "want" to see, which is the presence of some inherent difference, characterized by a false understanding of gender presentation. And the third and final visible comment below that says all it needs to say, I think.