this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
169 points (93.8% liked)

RPGMemes

14434 readers
142 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Assuming D&D 5e rules, this is easily countered by casting Gentle Repose on the corpse every 10 days, or any other method of preventing natural decay.

True Resurrection can only create a new body if the original no longer exists.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I guess this comes down to DM fiat as for what constitutes "touching" the creature. For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, which they were also taking any of those steps to prevent decay of?

The 3rd Edition version of the spell is even more ambiguous. RAW, it doesn't prevent you from "unambiguously identifying" the creature through a means other than touching the body even if the body still exists.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body,

RAW and RAI that wouldn't work, otherwise you could cast Inflict Wounds on someone by merely having a strand of hair from them. The RAW answer would be to have someone cast Contingency + Gentle Repose, though at that point you may as well add in a teleport or something instead

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There definitely should be some spells that work like that tbh, it's a classical trope of curse magic.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That wouldn't be a feature of the spell but of the caster

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)