this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
393 points (99.5% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (12 children)

It's what we voted for (I didn't vote for them, I mean as a collective).

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (11 children)

NATO should've been put as a separate issue public vote, whatever it's called in English. To make an international example, in the US they can vote for big shit or the lesser shit, so people vote for lesser shit, but that doesn't mean they want lesser shit policies.

Imo it's a big wrangled to say we voted for this, when we vote for packages and our options are severely limited. Maybe you agree?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you mean it should be settled out in a referendum?

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's the word 👍 (direct translation is people vote)

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)