this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
264 points (82.4% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin, running for a new six-year term in an election that his opponents say is a parody of democracy, said on Tuesday that past U.S. elections had been rigged by postal voting.

"In the United States, previous elections were falsified through postal voting ... they bought ballots for $10, filled them out, and threw them into mailboxes without any supervision from observers, and that's it," Putin said, without providing evidence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Not to mention that the economy is also typically better when a Democrat is the president.

This might be explained by the latency that large economic decisions have. As a practical example, the leftist government in Finland increased expenditure by quite a lot in Finland during 2019-2023 (mostly due to Covid-19 and Russia, but also beyond that) leading to a much increased governmental deficit. As a result, the economy is doing poorly now, and since the Finns chose a rightist austerity government in 2023, it looks as if the economy was doing well under a leftist government, and poorly under a rightist government -- even though the consequences for the current situation can clearly be derived from the previous government and there's no way the current government has had enough time contribute to the situation.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As most US presidents serve for 8 years (most win both terms), then such a lag would be noticed within their time in office. Your answer only applies to a small time frame, not an 8 year time frame

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm unfamiliar with the details of economics decisions in the US. How much does the president get to decide those things versus the House and Senate?

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's not an all or nothing with the economy and the president, but they do have some sway in some ways. Easy examples would be Biden's Build Back Better Plan can help change the American economy, and if he does get elected to a second term, it will show results then.

On the other side, Trump pushed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This has caused the deficit to climb, and didn't help spur any economic growth (in fact:

A study by the Federal Reserve Bank similarly found that corporations bought-back stock and paid down debt, rather than undertake either new capital expenditure or investment in research & development.

And many of the issues of this truly Act became an issue starting in 2021, which if Trump was in office, would have been reflected on his presidency. (It's part of the issues Biden has been having with the economy).