Lmao that has worked very well in the past
teichflamme
Fighting unlawful combatants is one of the hardest thing in war and has arguably never been solved completely.
So, yeah, there's not really lots of clear cut alternatives.
Fighting unlawful combatants is one of the hardest thing in war and has arguably never been solved completely.
So, yeah, there's not really lots of clear cut alternatives.
What? This country didn't allow education for women long before the US ever set foot there
If that is the best argument you can come up with you should probably take a look at your stance
Imagine being so dense that you'd simp for the fucking Taliban. At least they had something like a secular state and law in place during their occupation. Making it possible for women to attend universities or minorities to simply exist.
The fact that the occupiers didn't manage to solve every single problem in this war torn and split up country with no common ground doesn't mean it wasn't a net positive. Which it 100% was for everyone but the Taliban.
Supporting the terrorist group that brought this over them is pretty stupid.
And let's be clear here. They are terrorists, not rebels.
Pretty stupid, but okay
I could understand this post if it wasn't very glaringly obviously where the money was going.
Which is the war happening in front of all our eyes. And probably the most well documented war in human history.