There are actual cats that look like this, so probably it's real. It certainly doesn't seem AI generated to me.
GPTs also don't make images. That's not what Transformers do, and GPT means Generative Pre-trained Transformer. It's diffusion models and variational autoencoders that make images.
I don't think this is AI generated spam. There is apparently a real breed of cat that looks like this. I think you need to be less paranoid, this is lemmy.
He's right. You are just being really stubborn. The fact you think biological sex is simple is a big giveaway you don't know what you are talking about. XXY is not considered intersex and never has been.
The Internet here isn't the problem, the people in that village are the problem. They would be doing that regardless of if the Internet knew about it, if anything it's good we now know about these things. Someone might actually do something about it now.
So are you a marxist or something else?
You're the one who asked if I needed your vote lmao. I don't. You're just annoyed you don't have any leverage over me.
So I will take it you don't live here and I don't need your vote.
Which country do you live in? I live in the UK so unless you are here it's mostly irrelevant what you vote for.
Why are all the marxists coming out of the wood work? Y'all can't run a society for shit. Why are you still here and existing?
China was one of your experiments that went wrong. Go and build a working model for a socialist or communist society and I might listen. Until then you have nothing to add. Anarchists had better luck than you guys and you killed them for it.
Seriously, what end could splitting hairs over "peasants" or "artisans" possibly serve (And are those hundreds of years old terms even relevant in our world with our technology?)? Even the petit bourgeois is oppressed by the owning class, the system convincing them that a "middle class" exists is part of the fucking con, and the whole fucking point is to see how irrelevant these semantics are and fucking unite so that we can have a better society for everyone.. 🤦♀️
You haven't read marxist or anarchist theories very well if this is what you think.
Artisans are any one man business. They don't have employers to exploit them that's why they are an important class in marxist analysis.
Petty bourgeois aren't middle class necessarily; it refers to small business owners. They are exploiters of the workers beneath them while being exploited by others. Small time land lords would be petit bourgeois for example. These people are in essence part of the "owner class" because they own a business or building.
Peasants are not considered to be a revolutionary class because they aren't the proletariat. Not a problem in western societies but some countries still have peasants.
all of the systemic barriers we face (racism, sexism, ableism, querrphobia, and so on) exist to serve capitalism and those who benefit from it.
You don't think racism affects business owners or landlords? Or sexism? Or anything else?
This is the kind of assertion given without evidence that made me leave marxists behind. I am sick to death of people claiming all these problems are because of capitalism. If anything capitalism has helped address some of these issues like sexism because women not working is bad for the system. In fact not fully utilizing people because of prejudice in general is bad for capitalism which is all about efficiency and exploitation.
Edit: also policy regarding peasants is one area where marxism and anarchism differ significantly from what little I understand of anarchism.
Even marxists don't simplify the classes as much as that diagram suggests. It's missing peasants, artisans and the petty bourgeois. It's also never been as simple as capitalist vs working class. Capitalists regularly fight amongst themselves as do the working class. This whole idea of class struggle being the only struggle is so oversimplified it's kinda silly.
I don't think it's honest to frame it in generational language either btw. Though that is a component of it.
To me it looks like they used a bad camera that's too soft. That's all. AI images are often sharper and better looking than this if done using a good enough model and techniques.