KairuByte

joined 2 years ago
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You’re welcome! For reference it’s a code block, all formatting goes out the window, returns are considered returns, and a monospaced font. You use three backticks (```) on a line above and below your “code” (you can technically specify the code type at the end of that first back tick line) and then go to town between them.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
OOOOOOO
OOXXXOO
OXXXXXO
OXXXXXO
OXXXXXO
OOXXXOO
OOOOOOO
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That was their final iteration before I left, but previous to their changes it was the exact same thing. You could see, respond, etc. they just couldn’t see your responses.

Their final solution made for some stupid issues. Like accounts that went around intentionally spreading misinformation could just block the people that called out the BS, delete their comment, and say it again.

And worse, you couldn’t comment anywhere under their comment. So not just directly to them, but also anyone who replied to them. I had to make a secondary account for such situations because of a similar issue to the last paragraph.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

I didn’t read that as midges and I’m not sure how to feel about it.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

I wonder if those are truly mutually exclusive?

If a family unity could consist of up to 5 or 6, potentially more if it was a multi-generational home, and “at least one person per home” could read, that could be quite a low percentage point.

I guess it depends on what is meant by “almost nobody could read”, since that isn’t an exact figure. Does it mean 1%? 5%? 10%?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 2 years ago (29 children)

I don’t really get any an affair would matter after the fact for what is essentially a popularity contest, but… sure I guess?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

They’re making a joke, riffing off the “you let the magic smoke out” joke used in hardware repair. The “magic smoke” is when the chip fries and needs to be replaced, and mending can only physically repair magic items.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I wouldn’t even akin meta gaming to min-maxing, I’d say its closer to cheating. Not everyone plays the same obviously, and I’m sure some are fine with it. But your character is acting on information they couldn’t possibly know.

I get that it’s not technically cheating at a lot of tables, which is why we call it meta gaming instead, but still… it’s kinda BS.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I personally hate this kind of twist. If you need to actively lie to your player, not just mislead with some clever wordplay, it always feels like you’re breaking trust.

view more: ‹ prev next ›