Gabu

joined 2 years ago
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

A 'murican talking about experiencing the world, that's fucking rich. Also, I did provide you with the reason why Celsius is better than Fahrenheit - is your shitty 'murican education failing you?

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unless you can provide some sort of study that definitively finds Celsius as a better system, then you are just presenting your own opinion.

The fact you don't even know that Celsius is the same as Kelvin with a constant 273 added to it tells me so much about your failed education.

And the imperial system is going plenty strong. It’s used in the majority of aerospace manufacturing around the world.

It isn't. Once again, deluded 'murican doesn't understand anything about the world. How shocking.

but I’d still rather use a system that is clearer to understand at a glance and provides more whole number granularity when reading it off.

You still haven't provided any evidence that this is true. I'm starting to think you're mentally challenged.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Are you a child? Because otherwise you're possibly the most infantile adult I've ever seen. You make broad unfounded statements, then immediately backpedal and feel offended when called out for it.

No, opinions aren't equivalent to facts. You can't just say "hurr durr, I belive 2 is a bigger number than 3, you keep your opinion and I keep mine".

for standard ranges that most people use, I think its clearer to use fahrenheit.

Where did you find this information? What research did you look into that states people find the specific set of numbers used in Fahrenheit clearer? No, "my 'murican friends think so" doesn't count as research.

You can throw your casserole in the oven at a nice 182.22C, and I’ll put mine in at 350F.

Fallacious argumentation. As previously stated, the difference between 182 and 183 is negligible. You try to ascribe an extra level of complexity which doesn't exist in reality.

can’t figure imperial out.

There's no need to "figure out" an inferior system which was abandoned by the world for being too archaic. Or are you still "figuring out" old English?

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Fahrenheit is more descriptive.

Why and how? You haven't provided any evidence of this.

it’s better to use whole degrees and have more to choose from

Why? You haven't provided any evidence of this.

It’s better for cooking because it offers more granularity.

Again, you can use any value between any two degrees as needed. Are 'muricans so slow that they can't deal with decimal fractions?

I personally feel it’s vastly superior

Which is completely irrelevant. Your feelings mean literally nothing when we're discussing the inherent characteristics of a system.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

language of shakespeare

Maybe bullshit

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dear americans,
having a great great grandmother who lived in sicily doesn't make you Italian.
With contempt,
The World

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

nevermind the fact that Kelvin is better than both

Celsius and Kelvin are exactly the same temperature scale, only shifted by 273.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

The difference between 20ºC and 21ºC is imperceptible to a human. Ignoring the fact that you can easily increment in halves (20.5ºC), making your point complete moot, how is it narrow? Also, Celsius is an absolute scale, just like Kelvin. Fahrenheit is an abomination.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Four party slots? Four unga bunga friends!