Coki91

joined 2 years ago
[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Sure, have a good day!

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except that... he's already making the Caste pay?... 2 out of his 3 Decrees so far have already cut A LOT of Political Priviledges and Money making schemes planted by the Peronists, and more are to come out of his words. Sure the workers are paying too i'll give you that.

And yes, Massa was the President, of course not in an official way because that would be unconstitutional and Political Suicide, on the Most Peronist fashion it was all done under the rug. As soon as Massa assumed his charge the President Alberto Fernandez LITERALLY dissapeared from Public View AND Executively did NOTHING the rest of his mandate. Massa took his place both in Public Acts and on actually ordering the Country. There's no way to make this shit up given how blatant it was

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Im asking for a clarification or otherwise rewording of the meaning you tried to give with a dubious quote from a Past Era because It's not clear how it interjects with the topic at all

If you're not willing to provide that, I guess this convo is over

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know who's interpretation of Anarcho-Capitalism you are following, but since ther has never been an Anarcho Capilist government in the world (which sounds ironical) it's all just ideas and interpretations, of which seem you are grabbing the worst of the pile.

Rothbard's definition includes in the fundamentals of the Contractual Society being voluntarily approached and free of violence or harm, which is to say that if you do not respect the inalienable rights of the others, you are violating the Contract for being in that society, and you are rightfully gonna be aprehended. There is no contradiction

Also, to what you said about "demonstrated" something, mind linking to what you have? There's nothing around here like that

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What would have you chosen instead then? Something more precise would be good to know.

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 3 points 2 years ago

There's an Arg lemmy? If so mind linking it, dont think I've seen one yet

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Or... neither?

Words have meanings beyond the people that use them, if the meaning is appropiate for representing something, it shall be used.

Is not like "Phobia" is on many "Phobias" just for the sake of it.

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What are you on about?

Are you confusing principles and ideals of an ideology for an instated regime? Or what's your point here

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

You just gave me the right on everything about Espert... Including that he's just a legislator and LLA having an Alliance with JxC to be allowed to govern... So thanks I guess

However, no the Peso was not devaluated, the Official exchange just moved towards the real exchange since for some reason they dont want to steal more from the Workers and Tourists that fall for the trap of the Official Exchange... HMMMM

And yeah let's just be absolutists and say the right is never the answer, that's obviously flawless and correct and doesnt make you look any biased at all...

And would like to know the quote you are apparently replying to? Because so far Milei has advocated to follow the constitution, has complied with his campaign promises so far and has been democratically elected unlike his opponent in the Elections who has De-Facto President on his Minister of Economy facade, Surely those arent fascists, correct?

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

"Ancaps arent Anarchists"

Yes... exactly. I see you understand why they are called different things

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It was a genuine question, Im at a Loss of what are you trying to say or imply

I'll stand by my claim that a peaceful protest that doesnt violate anyone else's rights is not only possible, but should be the norm where these "Social" Organizations have only done the contrary in Argentina thus far.

[–] Coki91@dormi.zone -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Are you... advocating violence?...

I literally just said a peaceful manifestation without violation of the other's right is possible and has been done not even too far back.

And also, these "Piquetes" aren't peaceful at all. It is violent to stop workers from going to work, threatening their income necessary to sustain their life, it's a crime under the hood of enforcing a right and that's why they should be repressed. Those who don't incur on the people's freedom to go to work and live peacefully shouldn't be of course.

view more: next ›