this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
72 points (97.4% liked)

World News

34956 readers
466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Ukrainian army proposal to conscript up to 500,000 more civilians has produced mixed feelings in Kyiv, with many people saying more troops are needed to fight Russia but some suggesting it is pointless unless they get more weapons.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even without weapons more people getting training will be a good thing: First, because then you already have training when weapons become available, at this time Ukraine should leave no training spot unfilled, second, to make it easier to rotate troops in and out from the front, third, well now you have fighting experience which will make you even more effective once weapons arrive.

Side note: This is the first time (to my knowledge) that younger people will be called, IIRC 27 and younger. Average age in the Ukrainian army in 2022 was somewhere between 30 and 35, now it's 43 years, due to volunteers tending older as well as the army needing people who can fight, not people who they first have to teach basics, meaning they very much preferred people who already had served their draft time.

Also this isn't one of those wars where old men talk about glory and young men die. Not on the Ukrainian side, that is.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lots of Ukrainians escaping the draft as well

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Low single-digit percentages is not a lot, all things considered, in particular, it's more than low enough to be able to say, to each of them, "ok if you don't want to fight you're going to be a tank mechanic in the rear": People who don't want to fight are a liability on the front, anyway. There's also plenty of people who first fled to the EU and then turned around and joined the fight once the situation stabilised, once it was clear that Russia couldn't just take over the country.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a fight for survival. Now is not the time to stint. Hang in there, more aid planned for January.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not from Russia's United States though.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We will see. I'm not happy with Biden, but I think he could pull it off.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

He's the lesser of two ancient evils, but far less of an evil