72
CA Gov Gavin Newsom "Completely Aligns" With Charlie Kirk On Trans Issues In Podcast
(www.erininthemorning.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
72 points (95.0% liked)
LGBTQ+
4247 readers
136 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
People who transition to female are taking female hormones, dummy. A friend explained how even her sense of taste changed and she no longer likes some things she used to like.
Hey, guess what? Your argument is shit.
OK, but can you please tell me why its "shit"?
is it that you think its incorrect? I see stuff like this NIH study below specifically about atheletic performance in a transgender population at time of transition and after a period of performance change and it doesnt match whats presented in the links people replied with-- but heres the problem, I trust the NIH study more than I trust the arguments given in such a vehement and angry way in the other links. I have no real skin in this game. I beleive everyone has soveriegnty over their own body and if it doesn't very explicitely hurt me or another person, I say live your best life.
"post gender affirming hormone therapy, trans women still surpassed cis women for their 1.5 mile run time (765 ± 39.83 s. vs. 855 ± 40.56 s.), but performed significantly slower than cis men (720 ± 40.56 s.) unlike their pre hormone therapy assessment"
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10641525/
So why is this study wrong? thats a 90 second on average run advantage on a 1.5 mile course. In sports thats a lot.
If you believe the study is correct, could you summarize its conclusion for me?