this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
773 points (98.3% liked)
aww
26105 readers
105 users here now
A place with minimal rules for stuff that makes you go awww! Feel free to post pics, gifs, or videos of cats, dogs, babies, or anything cute and remember to be kind to others.
AI posts must be labeled [AI] in the title and are limited to one per week.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by instance-wide rules: https://mastodon.world/about
- No racism or bigotry.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but thatdoes not provide the right to personally insult others.
- No SPAM posting.
- No trolling of others.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I didn't say it was impossible.
That said, if somebody gave me the option to bet on a calico cat being female, I would always take that bet because I'd only be wrong about one in three hundred times (0.03333...% of the time) if the cat was randomly selected, whereas other coat colors it'd be 50-50.
Wouldn't that be three in a thousand?
Ah, you're right. It'd be 0.03333333...%
I'll edit
But you did say exclusively which implies that it would be only female. Which is just inaccurate.
The word "barring" in the context of my comment means "with the exception of"
What do you think the word "exclusively" means?
What do you think the word "barring" means? My original comment noted the sole exceptional case.